CI Head of Campaigns Justin
Macmullan looks at two things the new leadership of the G20 is getting right in
financial consumer protection
It was 18
months ago that G20 leaders meeting in Seoul, South Korea, respondedto CI’s call for international action to support financial consumer protection.
For much of
2011, whilst the French government held the G20 presidency, this new area of work
received enthusiastic support from Christine
Lagarde, the former French finance minister.
Now that the G20 presidency has moved to the Mexican
government, what can financial consumers and their representatives expect?
Initial
impressions are certainly good. On two of the key
issues identified by CI, the Mexican government is saying the right things.
First, in line
with the G20
declaration from Cannes last year, the Mexican government has called for
the development of a set of guidelines for the implementation of the OECD high level
principles on financial consumer protection.
When these
principles were adopted by the G20 last November, CI was critical of the weak
language that was used – though many of the issues covered were the right ones.
These guidelines offer an opportunity to add some of the detail and clarity
that was missing in the principles themselves.
The Mexican
government has also given strong support to the development of an international
organisation for national financial consumer protection agencies (FinCoNet).
This was another key CI demand and one that was taken up by the Financial
Stability Board (FSB) in their report on consumer
finance protection.
Given the
impact that failures in consumer banking and credit had on economies around the
world, many would say it is remarkable that such an organisation doesn’t
already exist.
So overall, the
Mexican agenda looks about right. The concern of course is what the final content
of the guidelines will be, how effective FinCoNet will be in delivering its
mandate and the speed with which this work will be delivered.
On the content
of the guidelines and FinCoNet’s effectiveness we will have to see, but CI will
certainly continue to lobby for the strongest possible guidelines and support
FinCoNet’s development into an effective international agency.
However, the
wheels of international negotiation certainly turn slowly. The Mexican
government has suggested a two-year timetable for the development of the
guidelines.
In their Cannes
declaration, the G20 committed to “pursue
the full application of these principles in our jurisdictions and ask[ed] the
FSB and OECD along with other relevant bodies, to report on progress on their
implementation to the upcoming Summits.”
With this
timetable, it is unlikely that any country will have their financial consumer
protection reviewed before 2014 – a full four years after the G20 first agreed
to address this issue. Is this just the price that has to be paid for international
consensus?
In 2008, when
the world was rocked by the biggest financial crisis in a generation, there was
a real sense of urgency and determination that this sector should be reformed. Four
years on, it is still a work in progress.
Put your question to the CI President
On 19 April, 17.30 GMT: CI President Jim Guest will be online with
World Bank Live to take questions on financial consumer protection
No comments:
Post a Comment